Students’ perception of scaffolding strategies applied by teachers in teaching TOEFL structure at Bimbel Arka Padang

Authors

  • Vania Lailatul Istianah Universitas Negeri Padang Author
  • Carbiriena Solusia Universitas Negeri Padang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/vtfqms22

Keywords:

Students' Perception, Scaffolding Strategies, TOEFL Structure , TOEFL Preparation

Abstract

English proficiency is essential for academic success, yet Indonesian students often struggle with the TOEFL Structure section due to complex grammatical differences. These challenges frequently lead to cognitive difficulties. Therefore, scaffolding strategies are needed to provide structured support through modeling and guided practice. This study aims to find out students’ perceptions of scaffolding strategies applied by teachers in teaching TOEFL Structure at BIMBEL ARKA Padang. A quantitative descriptive research design was employed. The population consisted of 80 students in the TOEFL preparation program, with 60 students selected via random sampling. Data were collected using a questionnaire based on perception theory, focusing on acceptance and evaluation indicators. The instrument comprised 20 closed-ended items on a 4-point Likert scale, analyzed using descriptive statistics to calculate mean scores. The results indicate that students had a positive perception of the scaffolding strategies, with an overall mean score of 3.16. The acceptance indicator reached a mean score of 3.17, showing that students positively perceived teachers’ explanations and guided instruction. Meanwhile, the evaluation indicator achieved a mean score of 3.15, indicating that feedback and gradual guidance effectively supported students’ independence in answering TOEFL Structure questions. The findings conclude that scaffolding strategies were positively perceived and significantly facilitated students’ understanding of grammatical structures. These results highlight the importance of structured instructional support in overcoming learning barriers in TOEFL preparation.

References

Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dardjito, H., Rolls, N., Setiawan, A., & Sumekto, D. R. (2023). Challenges in reading English academic texts for non-English major students of an Indonesian university. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(3), 1290–1308. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i3.29067

Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.

Hassen, S. K., Adugna, E. T., & Bogale, Y. N. (2023). Effects of scaffolding strategies instruction on EFL students’ writing achievement and perceptions. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(1), 272–292. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i1.6109

Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747

Nurdiana, N., Putrawan, G. E., Deviyanti, R., & Nisa, K. (2022). Student’s perception of the TOEFL preparation course proposal team. U-JET: Unila Journal of English Language Teaching, 11(1), 70–76.

Phillips, D. (2001). Longman complete course for the TOEFL test: Preparation for the computer and paper tests. Longman.

Robbins, S. P. (2003). Organizational behavior (10th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Saefurrohman, Istikaroh, L., & Utomo, B. P. (2020). TOEFL teaching strategies: EFL teachers implementation. Aplinesia: Journal of Applied Linguistics Indonesia, 4(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.30595/aplinesia.v4i1.12114

Sesriyani, L. (2019). Kesulitan yang dihadapi mahasiswa pendidikan ekonomi dalam menyelesaikan reading section pada TOEFL. EDUKA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Hukum, dan Bisnis, 4(2), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.32493/eduka.v4i2.3849

Sharpe, P. J. (2013). Barron’s TOEFL iBT (14th ed.). Barron’s Educational Series.

Sudijono, A. (2013). Pengantar statistik pendidikan. Rajawali Pers.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Zakiah, A., Dahnilsyah, D., & Masyhur, M. (2023). Students’ perception toward TOEFL prediction test as one of the graduation requirements from university. International Journal of Educational Best Practices, 7(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.31258/ijebp.7.2.273-286

Downloads

Published

14.05.2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Students’ perception of scaffolding strategies applied by teachers in teaching TOEFL structure at Bimbel Arka Padang. (2026). Journal of English Language Teaching (JELT), 15(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.24036/vtfqms22

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.